Callousness of Gonzale/Bush Secret Pardon of "Ali"/aka "Jeff el Hage"! Epitome Of Human Depravity, read guilty plea of "Ali"

OH MY FRIPPIN GOD! Page 17 of the "plea" is "sealed"..that means the DAMN sentence is SEALED! What in god's name is going on here? i've debated on posting this for quite some time. before you read this, i need for you to realize this is a Federal Court document. To let this "Sgt Ali" go after just 18 months, despite the fact he has murdered at least 3,000 and may actually be the "bag man/planner" for 9/11..If the President Bush would let this man go, I promise you...the rumors about members of the bush admin children being "empaled" for blood sport! read this and weep, for us and our nation!

Why let him go? Ali is the primary connection between 9/11 and Rockefeller/Giuliani Dirty Denizens?

Page 2-9 FILED UNDER SEAL! (Plea Deal is Secret) Fitzgerald signed a "voidable" Plea Deal, with this scum, under a Secret plea deal..which it appears, Fitzgerald agreed NOT to remand or arrest. The "voidability" option means that even if the Judge refuses to accept the Plea Deal.."voidability" means... Ali Mohammed, the Brains behind Oklahoma City...TO WALK! Fitzgerald gave the Planner of the 1993 WTC bombings..supervised release. I'm stunned! No wonder they shipped Fitzgerald off to Chicago..to save him?  Why was Fitzgerald reassigned to from "Gound Zero, Manhatton" to Chicago, on September 6th, 2001?

As a condition to his plea, (Abdul Saud) means Son/Father of Saud, which means he is a Royal Prince, in addition to being an active US Military Personnel, admitted that he had conspired within the United States to destroy US property, military and civilian establishments and without the US>. I can't believe this. They had one of the greatest mass murderers and the head of 80% of all Terror Against us Targets for the past 20 years, and the ROR the BASTARD,..on his own recognizance, pending a "SENTENCING HEARING" 9 months away!

They let "Ali  Mohammed' GO, just like "Scooter Libby". So now, Fitzgerald has proved my point. It's all a facade! It's NOT the 17 you indict..it's the 90% you let get away!

Curiously, the Court seems to be looking for a specific answer and "prompts" if there is anything else. to which the Son of Saud admits..he was using a tactic from the Marine Barracks explosions in Beirut. Did this man plan that too?

Technically, the Plea agreement clearly indicates that Ali (Son of Saud) Mohammed, did attack "American facilities" without specificity, which is broad enough to include Oklahoma City, in addition to the WTC and that he did attack "US Military Facilities" which would be broad enough to include the USS Cole...without specifying. Such a "specfication" would be in keeping with a "Sealed Indictment".

This is a list of the 17 Defendants in the Southern District of New York that Fitzgerald, Karas and Garcia (ICE-Homeland Security) prosecuted for bombing the US Embassies in Africa.

 You are going to have trouble finding this doc on line. You need to Google exactly what you see here: OMG! They gave him a $500 "special assessments instead of a fine" That way even if he fails to pay the $500, his "release cant' be revoked"

If  you want to see the original you have  to "google"..(""0aklmohp") It's the "docket code"

Source: Court Reporters Office of the Southern District of New York

See related court docket: http://cryptome.org/qaeda102000.htm

This transcript is from an appearance by Ali Mohamed before Judge Sand on October 20, 2000. Mr. Mohamed is one of 17 defendants in the bombing of US Embassies in Kenya and Sudan. And now the only one to plead guilty.

http://cryptome.org/usa-v-mohamed.htm

24 October 2000
Source: Court Reporters Office of the Southern District of New York

See related court docket: http://cryptome.org/qaeda102000.htm

This transcript is from an appearance by Ali Mohamed before Judge Sand on October 20, 2000. Mr. Mohamed is one of 17 defendants in the bombing of US Embassies in Kenya and Sudan. And now the only one to plead guilty.

 10aklmohpPLEA1    

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK2---------- 

 --------------------x3UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,4v.                           

 S(7) 98 Cr. 1023 (LBS)5ALI MOHAMED,6Defendants.7- 

 -----------------------------x8New York, N.Y.9          

October 20, 20001011Before:12HON. LEONARD B. SAND,13District Judge141516        

 APPEARANCES17   MARY JO WHITEUnited States Attorney for the18       

 Southern District of New YorkBY:  PATRICK J. FITZGERALD,19       

 KENNETH M. KARAS,MICHAEL GARCIA,20        

ANDREW C. McCARTHY,PAUL BUTLER,21       

Assistant United States Attorneys2

2For Defendant Ali Mohamed:23JAMES ROTH24  LLOYD EPSTEIN25

(Pages 2 through 9 filed under seal)

SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.212-805-0300100aklmohp 

 PLEA1            (In open court)2            D 

 EPUTY CLERK:  United States of America v. Ali3   Mohamed.4           

 Is the government ready?5             

 MR. FITZGERALD:  Yes, your Honor.  Good morning.6            

 THE COURT:  Good morning.7             

 DEPUTY CLERK:  Defendant ready?8             

 MR. ROTH:  Yes, your Honor.  James Roth for the9   defendant.  We're ready. 

THE COURT:  Mr. Roth, you have an application?11             

 MR. ROTH:  Yes, your Honor.  Your Honor, at this12   

 time, the defendant Ali Mohamed enters a plea of guilty to13    

 Counts One, Three, Five and Six of S(7) 98 CR 1023.14             

 THE COURT:  Isn't it One through Three?15             

 MR. ROTH:  I'm sorry.  One, Two, Three, that's16   correct.17             

 THE COURT:  And he is offering to enter a plea to18    

 Counts One, Two, Three, Five and Six of the indictment?19             

 MR. ROTH:  That is correct, your Honor.20            

 THE COURT:  And my understanding is that that offer21    

 is made pursuant to Rule 11(e)(C).22              

 MR. ROTH:  (1)(C), your Honor.23             

 THE COURT:  Yes.  Very well.24             

 Mr. Kenneally, will you arraign Mr. Mohamed.25             

 DEPUTY CLERK:  Mr. Ali Mohamed, please rise for aSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS,  

 P.C.212-805-0300110aklmohpPLEA1   moment.2            

  Is your attorney present, standing beside you?3             

 THE DEFENDANT:  Yes.4             

 DEPUTY CLERK:  Ali Mohamed, have you received a copy5   o 

 f the indictment S(7) 98 Crim. 1023?6             

 THE DEFENDANT:  Yes.7             

 DEPUTY CLERK:  Do you wish to have Counts One, Two,8   Three, Five and Six read out  

 loud to you?

 THE DEFENDANT:  No, sir.10             

 DEPUTY CLERK:  Do you understand the charges on each11   of Counts One, Two,  

 Three, Five and Six?12             

 THE DEFENDANT:  Yes, sir.13             

 DEPUTY CLERK:  How do you offer to plead as to those14   counts, guilty or not guilty? 

 15            THE DEFENDANT:  Guilty.16            

 THE COURT:  Very well.  Mr. Mohamed, how old are you,17   sir?18             

 THE DEFENDANT:  48, your Honor.19            

 THE COURT:  40?20            

 THE DEFENDANT:  8.21            THE COURT:  48.22            

 And how much schooling have you had?  How much23   schooling, education?24             

 THE DEFENDANT:  I have two bachelor degrees and one25    

 master's degree. 

 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.212-805-0300120aklmohpPLEA1            

 THE COURT:  And where did you obtain those degrees?2            

 THE DEFENDANT:  In Egypt.  University of Alexandria3   in Egypt.4             

 THE COURT:  And you read, write, speak and understand5    

 English without any difficulty?6             

 THE DEFENDANT:  Yes, sir.7           

 THE COURT:  Have you received a copy of this8   

 indictment and gone over it with your attorney?9            

 THE DEFENDANT:  Yes, sir.10             

 THE COURT:  And has he explained to you the charges11    

 contained in this indictment?12             

 THE DEFENDANT:  Yes, your Honor.13            

 THE COURT:  And have you told him everything that you14   

 know about these matters?15            

 THE DEFENDANT:  Yes, your Honor.16             

 THE COURT:  Are there any facts that you deliberately17    

 withheld from your attorneys?18             

 THE DEFENDANT:  No, your Honor.19            

 THE COURT:  I have been furnished a copy of a letter20    

 dated October 19 from the United States Attorney's Office to21   your attorney.   

 Have you signed such a letter?22            

 THE DEFENDANT:  Yes, your Honor.23            

 THE COURT:  Before signing such a letter did you go24    

 over it carefully with your attorneys?25             

 THE DEFENDANT:  Yes, your Honor. 

 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.212-805-0300130aklmohp 

 PLEA1          

 THE COURT:  Do you understand the terms and2   provisions contained in that letter?3             

 THE DEFENDANT:  Yes, sir.4            

 THE COURT:  Are there any understandings or5   agreements or  

 promises or inducements for you to enter into a6    

 plea other than those set forth in this letter?7            

THE DEFENDANT:  No, sir.8             

 THE COURT:  Very well.  We will mark the letter.9           

 Has it now been fully signed by all the parties?10             

 MR. ROTH:  Yes, your Honor.11            

THE COURT:  All the signatories?12             

 MR. ROTH:  Yes, your Honor.13            

THE COURT:  All right.  We will deem that marked as14   

 Court Exhibit A of today's date and it will be sealed.15            

Do you understand, Mr. Mohamed, that you have a right16    

 to continue to plead not guilty, and that if you do so, you17   

 have a right to a trial by a jury of 12 people, at which you18   

 would have the right to the assistance of counsel, and if you19    

 could not afford an attorney, one would be supplied at no cost20   

 to you, as indeed has happened?  Do you understand that?21             

 THE DEFENDANT:  Yes, your Honor.22             

 THE COURT:  Do you understand that at such a trial23   

 the burden would be on the government to establish your guilt24    

 beyond a reasonable doubt, to the unanimous satisfaction of25    

 all 12 jurors?   

 Do you understand that?SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.212-805-030014 

 0aklmohpPLEA1           

 THE DEFENDANT:  Yes, your Honor.2            

 THE COURT:  Do you understand that upon such a trial3    

 you would have the right to subpoena witnesses and to confront4    

 and to cross-examine all witnesses that were called by the5   government against you?   

 Do you understand that?6             

 THE DEFENDANT:  Yes, your Honor.7            

 THE COURT:  Do you understand that at such a trial8    

 you could remain silent, and no inference could be drawn9    

 against you by reason of your silence; or if you wanted to,10    

 you could take the stand and testify in your own defense, do11    

 you understand that?12             

 THE DEFENDANT:  Yes, your Honor.13            

 THE COURT:  Do you understand that if you wanted to,14    

 and the Court and the government agreed, you could have a15   trial before a judge,  

 without a jury, in which event you would16   have the same rights and  

 the same burdens would be on the17   government?18            

 THE DEFENDANT:  Yes, your Honor.19             

 THE COURT:  Do you understand that if your offer to20   

 plead guilty is accepted, that you would give up those rights21    

 with respect to these charges against you, and any right to22    

 appeal with respect to any prior proceedings in this case, and23    

 the Court would have the same power to impose sentence as it24    

 would have if a jury brought in a verdict of guilty against25   you?   

 Do you understand that?SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, 

P.C.212-805-0300150aklmohp 

 PLEA1  

 THE DEFENDANT:  Yes, your Honor.2             

 THE COURT:  Do you understand that in connection with3   

 your offer to plead guilty, I may ask you questions about the4    

 offense to which you are pleading guilty, and that if you5   a 

 nswered these questions under oath, on the record, and in the6    

 presence of your attorneys, if your answers are false, they7    

 may be used against you later in a prosecution for perjury or8   

 false statements?  Do you understand that?9             

 THE DEFENDANT:  Yes, your Honor.10            

 THE COURT:  This plea is offered pursuant to the11    

 provisions of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal12   procedure (e)(1)(C),  

 which provides, in pertinent part:13            

 "The attorney for the government and the attorney for14   the defendant may  

 agree that upon the defendant's entering a15   plea of guilty:  

 (C) agree that a specific sentence or16   sentencing range is the appropriate disposition 

 of the17   case. . . Such a plea agreement is binding on the Court once18    

 it is accepted by the court."19            And subparagraph 2 thereof says:20           

 "The court may accept or reject the agreement, or may21   defer its  

 decision as to the acceptance or rejection until22   there has been an opportunity 

 to consider the presentence23   report."24            Do you understand that 

 your plea agreement is made25   pursuant to that provision, and it 

 further provides if theSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.212-805-0300160aklmohp 

 PLEA1   parties agree, pursuant to that provision, that it is an2   a 

 ppropriate disposition of this case that Ali Mohamed shall3   not receive a 

 sentence of less than the sum set forth in the4   plea agreement?5             

 MR. ROTH:  May we approach for a second, your Honor?6           

 THE COURT:  Excuse me?7             

 MR. EPSTEIN:  May we approach for a second?8            

 THE COURT:  Yes.9            (Continued on next page)10            

 (Page 17 filed under seal)111213141516171819202122232425SOUTHERN  

 DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.212-805-0300180aklmohpPLEA1             

 (In open court)2            

 THE COURT:  Mr. Mohamed, the agreement is that the3   sentence shall be 

not less than a   term of years set forth in4   the plea agreement.  

 Do you understand that?5             

 THE DEFENDANT:  Yes, your Honor.6             

 THE COURT:  And that if the Court should reject that7    

 agreement, or impose a sentence of less than the terms set8   

 forth in the agreement, then this entire plea agreement is9   void,  

 do you understand that?10             

 THE DEFENDANT:  Yes, your Honor.11             

 MR. FITZGERALD:  Excuse me, your Honor.  Just one12   correction, your Honor.   

 I think the plea agreement will be13   voidable by the government, but not void.14            

 THE COURT:  Voidable.15             

 MR. FITZGERALD:  Yes.  Thank you, Judge.16           

 THE COURT:  Your offer is to plead guilty to five17   

 counts charging you with conspiracy to kill nationals of the18    

 United States, conspiracy to murder, kidnap and maim at places19    

 outside of the United States, conspiracy to murder, conspiracy20   

 to destroy buildings and property of the United States, and21    

 conspiracy to destroy national-defense utilities of the United22   States.23            

 Do you understand that pursuant to the relevant24   statutes, conviction on those 

 five counts would subject you to25   a total maximum sentence of incarceration  

  of life imprisonment

 plus any term of years.  Do you understand that you would be2   subject to that 

 potential sentence?3             

 THE DEFENDANT:  Yes, your Honor.4            

 THE COURT:  Do you understand that in addition to5   that, you would be  

 subject to a term of supervised release of6   five years on Counts One, 

 Two, Three and Five and three years'7   supervised release on Count Six?    

 Do you understand that?8            

 THE DEFENDANT:  Yes, your Honor.9            

 THE COURT:  Do you understand that if you are10    

 sentenced to a term of supervised release, if you violate the11    

 terms and conditions of supervised release, you will be12   subject to a  

 further term of incarceration without credit for13   time previously spent on supervised  

 release?14             

 THE DEFENDANT:  Yes, your Honor.15             

 THE COURT:  Do you understand that you also will be16   subject to a fine of the  

 greatest of $250,000, twice the gross17   pecuniary gain derived from the offense, 

 or twice the gross18   pecuniary loss as a result of the offense?19             

 THE DEFENDANT:  Yes, your Honor.20            

 THE COURT:  Do you understand you are also subject to21    

 a mandatory $500 special assessment?  You understand that?22            

 THE DEFENDANT:  Yes, your Honor.23             

 THE COURT:  And that the Court may at the time of24   sentencing impose  

 an obligation of restitution in an amount to25   be determined by the Court, d 

 o you understand that?SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.212-805-0300200aklmohp 

 PLEA1            

 THE DEFENDANT:  Yes, your Honor.2             

 THE COURT:  Are there any other punishments,3   penalties, sanctions to  

 which the defendant will be subject as4   to which he should be apprised at this time?5         

 MR. FITZGERALD:  No, Judge.6            

 THE COURT:  Do you understand that you will not be7    

 able to withdraw your plea if it should come about that the8   

 sentence actually imposed by the Court is higher than you9   anticipated or higher than  

 was estimated or predicted to you?10   Do you understand that?11            

 (Pause)12            

 THE DEFENDANT:  Yes, your Honor.13            

 THE COURT:  Have you been induced to offer to plead14   g 

 uilty by reason of any fear, pressure, duress, force,15   anything of that nature?16             

 THE DEFENDANT:  No, your honor.17            

 THE COURT:  Are you under the influence of any18   substances such as alcohol 

 , drugs or the like that might19   affect your ability to understand what you are doing?20   

 THE DEFENDANT:  No, your Honor.21            

 THE COURT:  Then do I understand that you are22   offering to plead guilty 

 because you believe that you are23   guilty?24            

 THE DEFENDANT:  Yes, your Honor.25            

THE COURT:  All right.  Mr. Kenneally,  

 will you place 

 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.212-805-0300210aklmohpPLEA1   

 Mr. Mohamed under oath, please.2            

Is there some other form of oath  

 that the defendant3   would prefer?4            

MR. ROTH:  We just asked him  

 whether he wanted to5   affirm, your Honor.6             

 THE COURT:  And his answer was?7            

 THE DEFENDANT:  Whatever.  It does not matter.8             

 (Defendant sworn)9            

 THE COURT:  What we're going to do now is I am going10    

 to ask the government to state on the record what the elements11    

 of the six counts are, what it is that the government must12    

 prove beyond a reasonable doubt to the unanimous satisfaction13   

 of 12 jurors to establish your guilt on those six counts, and14   then I 

 am going to ask you to tell me in your own words what15   it is that you 

 did that leads you to believe that you are16   guilty of those counts.17           

 So I would ask that the government now state the18   elements of the six causes 

 of action.19             

 MR. FITZGERALD:  Yes, Judge.  It's Counts One, Two,20   Three, Five and Six.21  

 THE COURT:  Yes.22             

 MR. FITZGERALD:  So that is actually five counts that23   

name defendant Mohamed  

 in the indictment.24            

Count One charges a violation of Title 18, United25   

 States Code, Section 2332(b), which is conspiracy to kill 

 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.212-805-0300220aklmohpPLEA1    

 nationals of the United States.  The elements of the crime2    

 that the government would be required to prove is that the3    

 defendant engaged in conspiratorial conduct outside the United4    

 States as part of a conspiracy to kill nationals of the United5    

 States, and that, specifically charged in Count One, the four6    

 goals of the conspiracy included murdering United States7    

 nationals anywhere in the world, killing United States8   nationals employed 

 by the American military in Somalia and9   Saudi Arabia, and, three,  

 killing United States nationals10   employed in embassies, and, four, 

concealment of the11  

 conspiracy.12            As to Count Two, which charges a violation of Title13   

 18, United States Code, Section 956(a)(1), and 956(a)(2), a14   

conspiracy to murder, 

 kidnap and maim in places outside the15   United States, the government would be 

 required to prove that16   the defendant Mohamed, within the jurisdiction of the United17  

 States, conspired with others who could be located anywhere to18    

 commit an act that would be murder or maiming if carried out19   within the special  

 maritime and territorial jurisdiction of20   the United States, and that any conspirator 

 committed an act21   within the United States in furtherance of that conspiracy,22  

 and as specifically charged, that the indictment alleges four23   objects:   

 killing United States nationals employed by the24   American military  

 in Somalia and Saudi Arabia; two, killing25   United States nationals at 

 embassies overseas; three, killingSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS,  

 P.C.212-805-0300230aklmohpPLEA1   United States civilians anywhere in the world; 

and  , four,2   concealment.3            Count Three charges a violation of Title 18,  

 United4   States Code, Section 1117, conspiracy to murder, and that5    

 requires that the defendant and one or more other persons6   conspired to violate  

 Sections 1114 or 1116 and that an overt7   act be carried out.  Specifically, in this 

 indictment it is8   charged that the conspiracy sought to violate both 1114 and9    

 1116.10            The requirements for Section 1114 is that the goal be11    

 to kill an officer or employee of the United States12   Government, including  

 members of the armed services, on13   account of their duties, and Section 1116 requires  

 that the14   goal be to kill internationally protected persons.  And15   internationally  

 protected persons are defined by statute to16   include, among others, employed U.S. 

 employees entitled to17   special protection by law, which would include ambassadors18 

 located in embassies overseas.19            As specifically charged in the indictment, 

 Count20   Three alleges that the conspirators sought to kill United21   

 States Government employees on account of their official22   duties, including 

 employees of the United States military in23   Somalia and Saudi Arabia and  

 employees located at embassies24   and, secondly, sought to kill internationally  

 protected25   persons and, third, sought to conceal the conspiracy.SOUTHERN  

 DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.212-805-0300240aklmohpPLEA1            

 Count Five charges a conspiracy to destroy buildings2   or property owned or 

 leased by the United States Government,3   in violation of Title 18, United States Code, 

 Section 844(n),4   and the conspiracy was to violate Title 18, United States5    

 Code, Section 844(f)(1) and (f)(3).  That would require the6   government to  

 prove that the conspiracy sought to damage or7   destroy buildings or property 

 owned or leased by the United8   States Government, and that a means of that 

 destruction was9   through the use of fire and explosives.  And for subsection10   

 (f)(3), another goal that would need to be proven was that the11   aim was to cause  

 death.12            As specifically charged in the indictment, Count Five13   would require 

 the government to show that the goals of the14   conspiracy were to bomb United States  

 embassies and kill15   United States Government employees; secondly, to attack the16 

 people and to harm the people within United States embassies17    

 and other American facilities; third, to attack the United18   States military facilities;  

 and, fourth, to seek to cause19   death by such conduct.20           

 And finally, Count Six charges a violation of Title21   18, United States Code, 

 Section 2155, which is a conspiracy to22   tilidestroy national-defense uties  

 of the United States.  That23   would require the government to prove that the  

 defendant was24   part of a conspiracy to interfere with the national-defense25    

 utilities of the United States by injuring or destroying such 

 utilities, and such national-defense utilities are defined to2   

 include buildings or structures of the armed forces, and that3    

 is to include buildings and structures in the American4   military overseas.5       

 In sum, all five counts will be proven by facts6   indicating that there was a  

 conspiracy to kill United States7   nationals overseas, which included both United  

 States8   employees, United States military employees, civilians and9   

 internationally protected persons; that Ali Mohamed joined10   

 that conspiracy; that an overt act was carried out; that11   conspiratorial conduct 

 was carried out within the U.S.; that12   conspiratorial conduct was carried out 

 outside the United13   States; that bombing was a method of the planned killing;  

 and14   that the targets included both military facilities and15    

 personnel as well as buildings, including embassies which16    

 housed internationally protected persons.17            

 THE COURT:  Thank you, Mr. Fitzgerald.18             

 Now, Mr. Mohamed, would you tell us in your own words19   what it is 

  that you did and when and where you did it that20   leads you to believe that you 

 are guilty of each of those21   charges.22      

 THE DEFENDANT:  Your Honor, in the early 1980s I23   became involved with the 

 Egyptian Islamic Jihad organization.24  (zorro note: Assassination of Sadat)

 In the early 1990s, I was introduced to al Qaeda  -- al Qaeda25   is the organization 

 headed by Usama bin Laden --   through my  involvement with the Egyptian Islamic Jihad.

 In 1992, I conducted military and basic explosives3   training for al Qaeda in  

 Afghanistan.  Among the people I4   trained were Harun Fadhl and Abu Jihad.  

 I also conducted5   intelligence training for al Qaeda.  I taught my trainees how6   

 to create cell structures that could be used for operations.7      

 In 1991, I helped transport Usama bin Laden from8    

 Afghanistan to the Sudan.9            When I engaged in these activities,  

 and the others10   that I am about to describe, I understood that I was working11    

 with al Qaeda, Bin Laden, Abu Hafs, Abu Ubaidah, and that al12   Qaeda had a 

 shura council, which included Abu Hajer al Iraqui.13            In the early 1990s,  

 I assisted al Qaeda in creating a14   presence in Nairobi, Kenya, and worked w 

 ith several others on15   this project.  Abu Ubaidah was in charge of al Qaeda in16    

 Nairobi until he drowned.  Khalid al Fawwaz set up al Qaeda's17   office in Nairobi. 

 A car business was set up to create18   income.  Wadih el Hage created a ch 

 arity organization that19   would help provide al Qaeda members with identity  

 documents.20   I personally helped el Hage by making labels in his home in21    

 Nairobi.  I personally met Abu Ubaidah and Abu Hafs at Wadih's22   house in Nairobi.23 

 We used various code names to conceal our identities.24   I used the name "Jeff" 

 el Hage used the name "Norman"; Ihab25   used the name "Nawawi." 

 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.212-805-0300270aklmohpPLEA1       

 In late 1993, I was asked by bin Laden to conduct2    

 surveillance of American, British, French, and Israeli targets3   

 in Nairobi.  Among the targets I did surveillance for was the4    

 American Embassy in Nairobi, the United States AID Building in5   Nairobi, the  

 United States Agricultural Office in Nairobi, the6   French Cultural Center, and  

 French Embassy in Nairobi.  These7   targets were selected to retaliate against the 

 United States8   for its involvement in Somalia.  I took pictures, drew9  

 diagrams, and wrote a report.  Khalid al Fawwaz paid for my10    

 expenses and the photo enlarging equipment.  He was in Nairobi11   at this time.12      

 I later went to Khartoum, where my surveillance files13   and photographs were  

 reviewed by Usama bin Laden, Abu Hafs,14   Abu Ubaidah, and others.  Bin Laden looked 

 at the picture of15   the American Embassy and pointed to where a truck could go as16   

 a suicide bomber.17            In 1994, Bin Laden sent me to Djibouti to do18   

 surveillance on several facilities, including French military19   bases and th 

 e American Embassy.20            In 1994, after an attempt to assassinate Bin L 

 aden, I21   went to the Sudan in 1994 to train Bin Laden's bodyguards,22   s 

 ecurity detail.  I trained those conducting the security of

23    the interior of his compound, and coordinated with the

24    Sudanese intelligence agents who were responsible for the25    

 exterior security.         

 In 1994, while I was in Sudan, I did surveillance2   training for al Qaeda.  Ihab Ali, 

 also known as Nawawi, was3   one of the people I trained.  Nawai was supposed to train4 

 others.5            In early 1990s, Zawihiri made two visits to the6  

 United States, and he came to United States to help raise7    

  funds for the Egyptian Islamic Jihad.  I helped him to do8   this.9      

 I was aware of certain contacts between al Qaeda and10   

 al Jihad organization, on one side, and Iran and Hezbollah on11   the other side 

 .  I arranged security for a meeting in the12   Sudan between Mughaniyah,  

 Hezbollah's chief, and Bin Laden.13            Hezbollah provided explosives  

 training for al Qaeda14   and al Jihad.  Iran supplied Egyptian Jihad with weapons.15   

 Iran also used Hezbolla to supply explosives that were16    

 disguised to look like rocks.17            In late 1994, I was in Nairobi.  

 Abu Hafs met another18   man and me in the back of Wadih el Hage's house.   

 Abu Hafs19   told me, along with someone else, to do surveillance for the20    

 American, British, French and Israeli targets in Senegal in21   West Africa.22            

 At about this time, late 1994, I received a call from23   an FBI agent who wanted to 

 speak to me about the upcoming24   trial of United States v. Abdel Rahman.  I 

 flew back to the25   United States, spoke to the FBI, but didn't disclose 

 everything that I knew.2            I reported on my meeting with the FBI to Abu  

 Hafs and3   was told not to return to Nairobi.4           

 In 1995, I obtained a copy  of the co-conspirator list5   for the Abdel Rahman trial 

 .  I sent the list to el Hage in6   Kenya, expecting that it would be forwarded 

 to bin Laden in7   Khartoum.8            In 1996, I learned from el Hage that 

 Abu Ubaidah had9   drowned.10            In 1998, I received a letter from 

 Ihab Ali in early11   January, 1998.  The letter said that el Hage had been12   

 interviewed by the FBI in Kenya, and gave me a contact number13   for el Hage.  

 I called the number and then called someone who14   would pass the message to 

 Fawwaz for bin Laden.15            After the bombing in 1998, I made plans to go 

 to16   Egypt and later to Afghanistan to meet bin Laden.  Before I17   could leave, 

 I was subpoenaed to testify before the grand jury18   in the Southern District of

 New York.  

 I testified, told some19   lies, and was then arrested.20             

 MR. ROTH:  That concludes the statement, your Honor.21           

 THE COURT:  The overall objective of all of these22   activities you described was, 

 what?23            

 THE DEFENDANT:  Just to -- I was involved in the24    

 Islamic Jihad organization, and the Islamic Jihad organization25   

 has a very close link to al Qaeda, the organization, for bin 

 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.212-805-0300300aklmohpPLEA1   Laden.   

 And the objective of all this, just to attack any2   

 Western target in the Middle East, to force the government of3    

 the Western countries just to pull out from the Middle East,4   not interfere in the --5 

 THE COURT:  And to achieve that objective, did the6    

 conspiracy include killing nationals of the United States?7             

 THE DEFENDANT:  Yes, sir.  Based on the marine8   explosion in Beirut in 1984 

 and the American pull-out from9   Beirut, they will be the same method, t 

 o force the United10   States to pull out from Saudi Arabia.11           

 THE COURT:  And it included conspiracy to murder12   persons who were 

 involved in government agencies and embassies13   overseas?14            

 THE DEFENDANT:  Yes, your Honor.15             

 THE COURT:  And to destroy buildings and properties16   of the United States?17             

 THE DEFENDANT:  Yes, your Honor.18            

 THE COURT:  And to attack national-defense utilities?19           

 THE DEFENDANT:  Yes, your Honor.20        

 THE COURT:  Anything further by way of allocution the21   

 government would request?22             

 MR. FITZGERALD:  No, Judge.23             

 THE COURT:  Mr. Roth, Mr. Epstein, do you know of any24   valid legal defense 

 that would prevail if the defendant went25   to trial?SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, 

 P.C.212-805-0300310aklmohpPLEA1             

 MR. EPSTEIN:  No, your Honor.2            

 THE COURT:  And I take it that the pending motions3    

 brought on your behalf are withdrawn.4             

 MR. ROTH:  That's correct, your Honor.5             

 THE COURT:  Mr. Mohamed, are you satisfied with the6   r 

 epresentation you have received from your two attorneys?7             

 THE DEFENDANT:  Yes, your Honor.8             

 THE COURT:  Mr. Mohamed, have you signed and has your9   counsel  

 signed an acknowledgment of rights form?10             

 THE DEFENDANT:  Yes, your Honor.11            

 THE COURT:  The Court finds that there is a knowing,12    

 voluntary plea of guilty which encompasses all of the elements13    

 of the charges to which the defendant has offered to plead14   guilty, and  

 the plea is accepted.15            

 The Court will defer until it sees a presentence16    

 report whether it does or does not accept the recommendation17   p 

 ursuant to Rule 11(e).18            I take it that there is no application for bail or19   

 for revision of the terms of bail.20            The plea may be entered.  

 We will set a sentencing21   date of nine months from today as a control date.22     

 MR. FITZGERALD:  Your Honor, my understanding is it23   

 is now required to advise the defendant pleading guilty that24  

 he is waiving his right to an appeal.25             

 THE COURT:  Yes.  Is that contained in the agreement?SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS,  

 P.C.212-805-0300320aklmohpPLEA1            

 MR. EPSTEIN:  It's not in the agreement.2     

 MR. FITZGERALD:  I don't believe it is in the3   agreement.  I was advised there is  

 recent case law that says4   it should be allocuted to at the time of the plea.5       

 THE COURT:  Do you understand that as a consequence6   

 of your offering to plead guilty, and the Court accepting that7    

 plea, you waive the right to appeal with respect to any8   proceedings 

 heretofore had in this matter?9             

 MR. EPSTEIN:  Your Honor, it's our understanding that10   

 he would be waiving any right to appeal relative to the plea11  

 itself, but in terms of subsequent proceedings, there is12   

 nothing in any agreement between the parties that would13   preclude an appeal.14         

 MR. FITZGERALD:  That's correct, Judge.  If there15   

 were something done illegally with regard to his sentence in16   t 

 he future, he is not waiving that, but he is waiving any past17   proceedings.18    

 THE COURT:  I believe I did tell him that:  if your19   offer to plead guilty i 

 s accepted, you would give up all the20   rights that you previously had and any 

 right to appeal with21   respect to any past proceedings in this case, and the court22    

 would have the same power to impose sentence as it would have23   if a jury returned  

 a verdict of guilty.24             

 Anything further?25            

 MR. FITZGERALD:  No, you 

 r Honor.SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.212-805-0300330aklmohpPLEA1       

 MR. ROTH:  No, your Honor.2            

 MR. EPSTEIN:  No, your Honor.3          

 -45678910111213141516171819202122232425SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS,  

 P.C.212-805-0300 

1. WADIH EL HAGE aka "Abdus Sabbur"

2 FAZUL ABDULLAH MOHAMMED aka Harun Fazhl aka Fazhl Abdullah aka Fazhl Khan

3 MOHAMED SADEEK ODEH aka Moath aka Noureldine aka "Marwan" aka Hydar

4 MOHAMED RASHED DAOUD AL-'OWHALI aka Khalid Salim Saleh Bin Rashed aka "Moath" aka Abdul Jabbar Ali Abel-Latif

5 USAMA BIN LADEN aka Usamah Bin-Muhammad Bin-Ladin aka Shaykh Usamah Bin-Ladin aka Mujahid Shaykh aka Hajj aka al Qaqa aka the Director

6 MUHAMMAD ATEF aka Abu Hafs aka Abu Hafs el Masry aka Abu Abu Hafs el Masry el Khabir aka Taysir aka Aheikh Taysir Abdullah

7 MUSTAFA MOHAMED FADHIL aka Mustafa Ali Elbishy aka "Hussein" aka Hassan Ali

8 KHALFAN KHAMIS MOHAMED aka Khalfan Khamis

9 AHMED KHALFAN GHAILANI aka Fupi aka Abubakary Khalfan Ahmed Ghailiani

10 FAHID MOHAMMED MSALAM aka Fahad M. Ally

11 SHEIKH AHMED SALIM SWEDAN aka Sheikh Bahamadi aka Ahmed Ally

12 MAMDOUH MAHMUD SALIM aka "Abu Hajer al Iraqi," aka "Abu Hajer"

13 ALI MOHAMED aka Ali Abdelseoud Mohamed aka Abu Omar aka Omar aka Haydara aka Taymour Ali Nasser aka Ahmed Bahaa Adam

14 AYMAN AL ZAWAHIRI aka Abdel Muaz aka Ayman Al Zawahiri, Dr. aka the Doctor

15 KHALED AL FAWWAZ aka Khaled Abdul Khaled Abdul Rahman Hamad al Fawwaz aka Abu Omar aka Hamad

16 IBRAHIM EIDAROUS aka Ibrahim H.A. Eidarous aka Daoud aka Abu Abdullah aka Ibrahim

17 ADEL ABDEL BARY aka Adel M.A.A.A. Bary aka Abbas aka Abu Dia aka Adel

This is the "PLEA" to the Secret Indictment of Ali (the Saud) Mohammed ( Please keep in mind that despite Ali's "presence" Fitzgerald apparently had orders NOT to have the Bailiff/Sheriff "remand Mr. Ali into Custody". He was a free man...and it's possible he was NEVER incarcerated! It appears Bush Pardoned HIM!